Chapter 5. The bad (and the good) of the Internet - AMORE STORIES - ENGLISH
#Gillian Feng
2018.01.17
0 LIKE
161 VIEW
  • 메일 공유
  • https://stories.amorepacific.com/en/chapter-5-the-bad-and

Chapter 5. The bad (and the good) of the Internet

ColumnistGillian Feng
APC MC Team


 It was almost six years ago when Luo Yonghao, CEO of the Chinese smartphone manufacturer Smartisan and an active opinion leader at the time, smashed three Siemens refrigerators outside the Siemens' headquarters in Beijing. His actions, which took place on November 20, 2011, soon went viral as video and images of Luo spread quickly online. In fact, it went so far that many Chinese netizens declared a boycott of Siemens to show their support for Luo's protest against the quality problems with Siemens' products. News of this spread worldwide with French media running an article titled "China no longer has blind faith in the quality of German brands." The protest even grabbed the attention of media in Siemens' homeland, Germany.
 While not being a desirable situation for the company, Luo's protest did enlighten the Chinese people as to how they could use the Internet to get their voices heard by companies in China where it is well-known that the legal regulations for the protection of consumer rights are quite woeful. Even global companies are as yet to take any active measures to customer complaints regarding their products. Some companies have even gone as far as saying that it is in fact the customers who are in the wrong. Customers now though have begun raising their voice against the negligence of these companies, and the medium of preference to do so is the Internet. The question that comes up now though is how exactly these companies should respond to such changes in customer behavior.

 Another example of how the Internet has been used to the detriment of large global companies in China can be seen in the case of McDonald's. In July 2014, Chinese meat supplier Shanghai Husi Food was caught supplying out-of-date meat to American fast food chains, including McDonald's and KFC. Shanghai Municipal Food and Drug Administration recalled and suspended production at Shanghai Husi Food as their investigation began. However, what brought more attention to the problem was how KFC and McDonald's responded to the situation, and how different their approaches were. KFC responded simply and swiftly by terminating their supply contract and signed up with a new supplier, no harm done. McDonald's though, despite initially seeming as though they too would follow KFC and stop doing business with the troubled meat supplier, merely switched to Henan Husi, another Husi Food supplier in China's central Henan province. The natural outcome of this was that thousands of Chinese netizens became outraged and likewise expressed this sentiment online by declaring a boycott against the fast food company. As criticism continued to mount, McDonald's announced that they would no longer source any products from Husi Food, but the damage was already done. Negative online press continued and within two months, the company was left with only drinks in their restaurants as they were unable to find a new meat supplier.
 While both companies reacted promptly to the situation, the way in which they did so had remarkably different outcomes. It was felt that KFC demonstrated respect for their customers while McDonald's did not and in fact, made an already bad situation worse. Perhaps the irony of the situation is that customers initially felt that the two fast food chains were the victims and that Husi Food was more culpable of blame. The perceived deception by McDonald's though soon led to online calls for consumer boycott.

 These types of situations are not only limited to companies though. Only just a few months ago in response to child abuse in a nursery becoming known, Chinese netizens once again raised their voices online and called for the strengthening of management and supervision by the government. Not even the Red Cross Society of China was immune to the strength of the online community as it lost public trust after revelations of the society's misuse of donations. Famous Chinese actor Wen Zhang was caught cheating on his wife and subsequently, his career was thrown into crisis. More and more, the wrongdoing of public figures, companies and the government spreads rapidly online thanks to the publicly open opinions of online netizens. As such, it is felt that there is a need for a prompt and wise response as follows:

Though a problem comes up and a company finds itself at odds with the public, the situation can be quelled as long as it is handled quickly within eight hours at the least. Failure to do so will see the damage from the situation only grow. The wisdom that needs to be applied to the situation though is that even if a response is swift, one should not leap blindly to conclusions regarding complicity to the allegations, especially if it is unclear where the fault truly lies. It is important to remember that reasonable decisions can be made only after a thorough investigation into the problem. Truthful evidence needs to be gathered and communication maintained with the public to deliver a clear, concrete solution and handle any negative press. Emphasis on expressing the truth to the public is essential to avoid more public criticism;


Executives or others in higher positions need to step up and show responsibility. If general employees come forward, this gives an air them being used as scapegoats for the company in the eyes of the customers;


The establishment of open communication channels is also a point of importance. Social media accounts can be used to communicate freely with customers in the event of a problem occurring. These accounts can also be used to gauge customer reactions and likewise devise follow-up measures to correct any misleading comments and avoid media bias. There are, however, always people who will post negative comments, but these can be turned to a company's advantage by listening to and resolving complaints as they arise;


One other approach that can be used to clarify the truth when being falsely accused is to cooperate with online influencers.

 With the advent of the Internet, customers now have the freedom to voice their opinions online. However, as with many things in life, having such freedom to speak means that there will always be online "trolls" with the power to cause serious damage to businesses and celebrities. The Internet can be a great weapon for many but like any sword, it does cut both ways. While it does allow for more open communication between companies and consumers, celebrities and their fans, unfair use of the Internet, such as exaggerating issues out of proportion or posting malicious comments, continues to be a problem. Even though it will not be a simple task, it is necessary to root out cybercrime to reduce the amount of people being blindly misled by false information and yet still allow the public to effectively have their say.

  • Like

    0
  • Recommend

    0
  • Thumbs up

    0
  • Supporting

    0
  • Want follow-up article

    0
TOP

Follow us:

FB TW IG